Anna Rochester & Grace Hutchins Residence
Leading social reformers Anna Rochester and Grace Hutchins lived in an apartment in this building from 1924 until their deaths in 1966 and 1969, respectively.
Founders of the Labor Research Association, the couple was deeply involved in efforts to improve labor conditions, especially for women, with a special interest in conditions for African-American women.
On the MapVIEW The Full Map
Anna Rochester (1880-1966) and Grace Hutchins (1885-1969) were members of an early generation of affluent, well-educated women who did not need husbands for support and were able to establish long-term, loving relationships at the same time that they became leading figures in the world of social reform. In New York, similar prominent couples included Lillian Wald and Mabel Hyde Kittredge, Marion Dickerman and Nancy Cook, Elisabeth Irwin and Katharine Anthony, Elisabeth Marbury and Elsie de Wolfe, and Molly Dewson and Polly Porter. Greenwich Village was an especially welcoming neighborhood for these couples. Rochester and Hutchins moved into a third-floor apartment in the co-op at 85 Bedford Street in 1924 and remained there until their deaths.
Rochester and Hutchins were both reared in upper-middle-class households, attended Bryn Mawr College, and became involved in social reform through the Episcopal Church. They met in 1919 at a retreat for the Episcopal laywomen’s organization, The Society of the Companions of the Holy Cross. The couple moved from Christian social activism, to socialism, and then to membership in the Communist Party, following a 1927 visit to the Soviet Union. They remained active members of the party for the rest of their lives. Rochester and Hutchins were deeply involved in efforts to improve labor conditions, especially for women, with a special interest in conditions for African-American women. Each wrote extensively about injustice, racism, and the problems of American capitalism. They were founders of the Labor Research Association, an independent organization allied with the Communist Party. Hutchins wrote the association’s biannual Labor Fact Book, a well-regarded collection of labor statistics that were used to further pro-labor advocacy. During the post-war anti-communist witch hunts, Hutchins, in particular, used her fortune to post bail for party members who had been arrested.
Framed by privileges of race and class, they enjoyed a financial security and independence that allowed them to eschew marriage and share a life together. From this relatively secure base, Hutchins and Rochester were able to commit their lives to social and economic change, use their wealth to support their causes, and embark on an ideological journey from Christianity to Communism.
Rochester, Hutchins, and their peers in same-sex female relationships would not have referred to themselves as lesbians, a term that was generally used, at the time that they met, to refer to what some viewed as socially unacceptable and immoral activities. Although active Communists, Rochester and Hutchins saw themselves as highly respectable women. Even when the Communist Party USA purged homosexuals from its ranks, Rochester and Hutchins remained, as they did not see themselves in this light. Yet, they had a loving relationship of over forty years, writing intimate letters to each other, referring to each other as “partner,” and often professing their love. Their relationship was, as Julia Allen notes, “the foundation from which they would help to create a new world.”
- Architect or Builder: Samuel A. Warner
- Year Built: 1889
Janet Lee, Comrades and Partners: The Shared Lives of Grace Hutchins and Anna Rochester. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000. [source of pull quote]
Julia M. Allen, Passionate Commitments: The Lives of Anna Rochester and Grace Hutchins. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2013, 8. [source of Julia Allen quote]
Do you have more information about this site?
This project is enriched by your participation! Do you have your own images of this site? Or a story to share? Would you like to suggest a different historic site?